The Prosecution and Censorship of "Rainbow"
Lady Chatterley's LoverThe prosecution and suppression of The Rainbow marked a decisive collision between D. H. Lawrence’s experimental treatment of sexual love and the legal and critical limits placed on its publication. The novel’s removal from circulation in 1915 made censorship a direct interruption of Lawrence’s developing literary work, delaying the public appearance of its sequel, Women in Love.
Publication and Context
The Rainbow appeared in 1915, during a period when Lawrence was writing intensively about relations between men and women. His new confidence and radical experimentation with sexual love brought him into conflict with censors. The novel’s graphic descriptions of sex were central to the objections raised against it, placing its treatment of intimacy under public and legal scrutiny.
Prosecution and Suppression
The novel was almost immediately banned in Britain, and its publisher was prosecuted under the Obscene Publications Act 1857. Suppression went beyond restricting future distribution: more than 1,000 copies of the book were burned. The combination of prosecution, prohibition, and destruction made the response a material as well as a legal intervention in the novel’s circulation.
Critical Opposition and Consequences
The legal action was accompanied by hostile public reviews. The critic Clement Shorter denounced the book, while the popular novelist John Galsworthy also condemned it. Their reactions show that resistance to The Rainbow extended beyond the courtroom and involved a wider argument over whether Lawrence’s depiction of sexual relations could be accepted as literature. Although Lawrence retained high critical esteem among some readers, the legal and popular hostility shadowed his work.
The suppression also affected the appearance of Lawrence’s next novel. Women in Love, which developed the literary project associated with The Rainbow, did not find a publisher until 1920. The five-year interval between the 1915 prosecution and that publication gives the censorship episode a lasting consequence: it constrained the route by which Lawrence’s closely connected works reached readers.